We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to browse this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, please refer to our privacy policy.

Super Bowl 2025 Ad Rankings

Thank you for subscribing!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.

Sign up to our effectiveness newsletter

The Monday after the Super Bowl brings an avalanche of hot takes and subjective rankings on the ‘best’ and ‘worst’ ads of the night. But while opinions and viral moments might dominate the conversation, what truly matters is a rigorous, evidence-based approach to evaluating success. Without a robust methodology grounded in empirical data, all we’re simply doing is guessing. And for the evidence we look no further than Professor Byron Sharp of the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute and his seminal publication, How Brands Grow.

In it advertising’s primary job is made crystal clear: building mental availability. To achieve this goal it’s first and foremost critical that advertising elicits an emotional response—given it enhances depth of mental processing and strengthens memory encoding. But creating an ad that’s memorable is ultimately only one half of the jigsaw puzzle—its potential isn’t fully realized if these memories aren’t inextricably connected to the brand. Cubery’s Branded Memorability score (our headline prediction of an ad’s short- and long-term effectiveness) places an equal emphasis on these two core elements:
1. Emotional Response 💜
2. Brand Linkage 🔗

🏈 Check out the full Super Bowl rankings for 2025 split out by key verticals below (click the thumbnail to watch the ad). Reach out if you’d like to discuss the results in further detail or if you have a campaign of your own that you’re interested in testing!

Explore our advertising testing/tracking solution here.

The 2025 rankings

Reese’s  |  Don’t Eat Lava
Branded Memorability: 85 (+11 vs. 2024)
Reese’s Super Bowl ad had it all, showcasing Reese’s new product in a way that was not only highly memorable but also synonymous with what people know and expect of the brand. For Reese’s that’s fun, out-there, and highly explosive physical humor—all elements dialed to the max in “Don’t Eat Lava”, ensuring the ad could’ve only ever been for Reese’s.
“Love it, it was funny different and makes me want to go buy some right now.”
Doritos  |  Abduction
Branded Memorability: 78 (-5 vs. 2024)
After nearly a decade Doritos reinstated their “Crash the Super Bowl” contest, with 2025 delivering something truly out of this world. Fighting an extraterrestrial over the distinctly packaged chips ensured the brand remained at the forefront throughout. Although sparking some slight annoyance, that the ad communicated the product’s irresistible taste was undeniable. Blending humor and energy to captivate audiences in a distinctly on-brand way, it’s a not too shabby effort for a competition winner!
“I like how it has a silly and unique tone with the aliens wanting the Doritos too.”
Pringles  |  The Call of the Mustaches
Branded Memorability: 70 (-1 vs. 2024)
Changing tact from the warmth and happiness elicited in last year’s “Mr. P” spot, Pringles this year delivered an equally effective ad, albeit engaging people in an entirely different way. By leveraging some of America’s most iconic mustaches, the approach worked to equally enrapture viewers as it did annoy them, ensuring all eyes were fixated on not only the story but also Pringles’ unique branding device—the mighty mustache.
“The mustaches were funny and weird. I don't know if I liked it or not, but it was funny.”
Totino’s  |  Chazmo Finally Goes Home
Branded Memorability: 65 (New in 2025)
Another newcomer to the Super Bowl festivities, Totino’s introduced fall campaign character Chazmo the Alien to a much broader audience. While the protagonist’s untimely demise proved a divisive element among viewers, people nevertheless found the approach (along with the recognizable fathers) highly attention grabbing. Brand linkage was also reasonable thanks to the ad’s consistencies with previous campaigns.
“It was a messed-up ad to kill the Totino’s guy.”
Lay’s  |  The Little Farmer
Branded Memorability: 65 (-4 vs. 2022)
Lay’s 2025 Super Bowl ad featured the heart-warming story of a young girl growing a potato on her family farm, with the slow pace and rustic soundtrack helping reinforce the desired sentimentality. Although the emotional story was well received and fit well with expectations of the brand (with little narrative twists and turns to sustain engagement), the approach ultimately didn’t stand out and disrupt the status quo.
“It was a little bit hard to tell at first that it was a Lay’s commercial, but that little girl was so endearing.”
Ritz  |  Salty Club
Branded Memorability: 64 (New in 2025)
Joining the Super Bowl party this year, Ritz’s chose actors best known for their salty demeanor (Aubrey Plaza & Michale Shannon) in order to pitch the salty goodness of their signature cracker. The cameo performance of “Bad Bunny” helped spark engagement (for both positive and negative reasons), while the excellent use of assets emphasizing both the biscuit and red and yellow colors ensured people couldn’t forget Ritz was behind the ad.
“I liked that Ritz was shown throughout the ad, but the message was sort of bland.”
Nerds  |  Wonderful World of Nerds
Branded Memorability: 63 (-8 vs. 2024)
In a category known for its in-your-face sugar rush ads, Nerd’s mellow shift was sweet but ultimately struggled to satisfy. While celebrity appearances do hold sway, this year’s more pleasant tone—backed by Shaboozey’s “What a Wonderful World”—just wasn’t enough to help the candy brand stand out competitively. The rainbow colors and fun animated characters also felt a touch generic (Skittles, anyone?).
“I liked the New Orleans setting, the music, but didn't clue in what the product was until the end.”
Oikos  |  Surprising Strength
Branded Memorability: 63 (-11 vs. 2024)
After the success of last year’s “Hold My Oikos”, rinse and repeat was the directive for 2025. However, “Surprising Strength”—featuring British actor Juno Temple and footballer Myles Garrett—ultimately wasn’t strong enough to reap the same rewards as the affable Martin Lawrence last year. Although following nearly the exact same narrative structure, (balancing the use of celebrities while championing the yoghurt as the hero), the ad didn’t land the same punch.
“Trying to say that she could carry him after eating the yogurt was slightly lame.”
Haagen-Dazs  |  Not So Fast, Not So Furious
Branded Memorability: 62 (New in 2025)
Haagen-Dazs aimed to convey its “slow down and savor” positioning by featuring high octane action star Vin Diesel for their first-ever Super Bowl advert. While the addition of a string of Fast & Furious characters certainly helped create the desired cut-through and emotional engagement, the selection of celebrities (and overall theme) ultimately jarred with people’s expectations of the brand.
“I did not like the actors. This product does not fit them.”
Hellmann’s  |  When Sally Met Hellmann’s
Branded Memorability: 60 (-13 vs. 2024)
After Mayo Cat proved one of 2024’s most talked about Super Bowl ads, Hellmann’s 2025 homage to “When Harry Met Sally” struggled to deliver the same positivity. In short, the ad created significant annoyance—notably spiking during Meg Ryan’s character’s boisterous performance. What’s more, with the move away from the brand’s existing positioning (how the brand “levels up leftovers”), people’s recollection of Hellmann’s as the creative hero was diminished.
“I think this ad was inappropriate for a condiment.”
Mountain Dew  |  Kiss From a Lime
Branded Memorability: 67 (-11 vs. 2024)
Pulling out all stops to grab people’s attention, Mountain Dew loaded up its 2025 ad with mind-bending CGI and 90’s power ballads in the form of recording artist Seal as a… seal. The approach worked a treat to get people’s attention, drawing upon both sides of the emotional spectrum. Some loved the idea, finding the visuals amusing and highly distinctive; however, others found the parodied song irritating, impacting overall enjoyment. Regardless, the ad will undoubtedly be talked about over the water cooler on Monday.
“I loved that the entire thing was based on a Seal pun. It was quite a weird ad in a good way.”
Poppi  |  Soda Thoughts
Branded Memorability: 62 (-7 vs. 2024)
After bursting onto the scene in 2024 with a highly likeable ad that had a simple focus on the brand’s health benefits, this year leant on youthful relatability thanks to a vibrant montage of Gen-Z content creators. However, the product-heavy voiceover (which focused on category pitfalls) caused some people to disengage with the narrative well before the brand’s eventual introduction.
“It was confusing at first but then went in to the ad portion and it made sense after that.”
Cirkul  |  You Got Cirkul
Branded Memorability: 61 (New in 2025)
While Cirkul’s Super Bowl debut ad was found reasonably attention-grabbing, high levels of confusion over the proposition ultimately impacted people’s enjoyment of the ad. With this lack of clarity also limiting how clear people were on the brand behind it, the ad’s ability to build long-term memories for Cirkul was ultimately inhibited.
“At no point in the ad did it explain what the product actually is. I don't know if it's bottled water, a reusable water bottle, or a home water delivery service.”
Coffee-Mate  |  Foam Diva
Branded Memorability: 53 (New in 2025)
Coffee-Mate’s first steps into Super Bowl advertising certainly weren’t tentative, with the brand delivering a highly attention-grabbing creative thanks to its energetic soundtrack and wild tongue… dance. However, with many turned off by the visual theme it stirred annoyance and ultimately detracted from emotional engagement. Additionally, with the dancing tongue taking the lion’s share of attention—and being an unfamiliar branding device—people struggled to connect the memories back to Coffee-Mate.
“I didn't like the tongue part of the ad. Some people may find it gross and I didn't enjoy it.”
Liquid Death  |  Safe For Work
Branded Memorability: 67 (New in 2025)
In true Liquid Death fashion, the brand’s first Super Bowl appearance leveraged shock tactics in order to stand out from the crowd. With a thematic focus on workplace drinking (i.e. alcohol), the ad effectively drew people in thanks to multiple high-octane scenes in which a can of Liquid death was front and center. With the amusing concluding punchline revealing the brand’s true proposition (flavoured water and iced tea), Liquid Death ensured people were forced to pay attention from start to finish.
“I like that it makes it seem bad but there is no alcohol in the can.”
Michelob ULTRA  |  The ULTRA Hustle
Branded Memorability: 79 (+11 vs. 2024)
The addition of Willem Dafoe and Catherine O’Hara in 2025 worked to deliver a much more attention grabbing and emotionally appealing spot than last year’s recruitment of Lionel Messi as celebrity spokesperson. The true success of the creative, however, lay in its ability to avoid the dreaded consequence of celebrity overuse in advertising: that their presence ultimately overshadows the brand. Instead, by positioning ULTRA as the prize up for grabs in each Pickleball battle, it ensured the brand was front and center throughout.  
“I liked that the beer was shown throughout the ad and that the older couple would play anyone for it.”
Budweiser  |  First Delivery
Branded Memorability: 75 (-2 vs. 2024)
Those Clydesdales just keep on going on for Budweiser! Consistently ranking near the top of our database for strength of brand linkage, Budweiser’s Super Bowl ads are a proven formula for success. By placing its ownable assets at the forefront of emotionally charged narratives—depicting the backbone of America—Budweiser time and time again ensure the emotions generated are seamlessly connected back to the brand. With 2025 no exception, it was another big tick for the king of beers (and of Super Bowl advertising).
“I love all the Budweiser ads that have the Clydesdale horses, since I was a little kid.”
Stella Artois  |  David & Dave
Branded Memorability: 71 (New in 2025)
Fresh from a series of much talked about billboards in Times Square, Stella Artois again utilized its brand ambassador, David Beckham, in a brand-centric narrative featuring Matt Damon as his long-lost American brother. The warm and humorous narrative was well enjoyed, with the ad sustaining viewer interest and intrigue throughout thanks to the highly likeable celebrity duo.
“I like the interaction between the two celebrities. It had some good jokes and it was overall engaging.”
Coors Light  |  Slow Monday
Branded Memorability: 62 (-16 vs. 2024)
Unlike the brand’s 2024 Super Bowl masterclass in leveraging distinctive brand assets (i.e. the iconic Coors train), this year’s showing struggled to get out the blocks—with the slow Mondayitis theme not eliciting the high intensity emotional response hoped for. And while Coors Light worked extra hard pre-game to ensure their Monday message would be linked to the brand (perhaps foreshadowing it could be an issue), it ultimately fell short.
“This ad was a bit boring and I had no idea what the product was.”
Bud Light  |  Big Men on Cul-De-Sac
Branded Memorability: 77 (+3 vs. 2024)
Bud Light’s humorous and distinctive spot continued kicking up another gear as the cul-de-sac party unfolded. Featuring celebrity cameos from comedian Shane Gillis, Peyton Manning, and Post Malone (the former two returning characters from 2024), the ad displayed all the right ingredients for strong effectiveness. The approach not only worked to grab people’s attention but equally the ad aligned with people’s pre-existing expectations the brand—while the strong blue presence and flying cans helped make the ad instantly identifiable for Bud Light.  
“I liked how they threw Bud Lights with a leaf blower.”
Instacart  |  We’re Here
Branded Memorability: 72 (New in 2025)
Normally, featuring the mascots of other brands within your own ad would be a sure-fire way to sever branded memories. But in the case of Instacart, it actually worked like a charm. Not only did usage of these familiar faces help drive strong emotional engagement, but Instacart was also able to leverage the trust and credibility attached to each iconic character (and their respective brands).
“I liked all of the brand mascots, it was fun picking them out.”
Little Caesars  |  Whoa!
Branded Memorability: 69 (New in 2025)
From iconic mascots to iconic… facial hair? Yes, you heard us right. Starring Eugene Levy and his famous pair of brows, Little Caesars’ Super Bowl spot delivered comedically—showcasing the havoc that Levy’s fluttering eyebrows caused across a range of scenarios. What’s more, with the brand’s crazy puffs clearly acting as the set up for the flying facial hair, connection back to brand was relatively strong.
“I like the humor of the Little Caesars ad. I also like the crazy puffs.”
Uber Eats  |  A Century of Craving
Branded Memorability: 69 (-8 vs. 2024)
Centered around Matthew McConaughey’s belief that football was invented to make people hungry, Uber Eats’ narrative tied in well with the brand’s core proposition. While the vintage black and white visuals and array of celebrity cameos worked to draw people in early, a lack of uniquely attributable cues throughout the narrative somewhat stymied how attributable the ad was for Uber Eats (an element effectively taken care of last year courtesy of a multitude of green delivery bags throughout).
“I like how they highlighted the names and ways to make something connect to food.”
Dunkin’  |  Dunkings 2
Branded Memorability: 65 (-9 vs. 2024)
Dunkin’ Super Bowl ads have always been a highlight in showcasing the brand’s distinctive assets, with this year’s spot no exception. From the orange and pink duotones to the brand’s consistent deployment of celebrity cameos with links to the Boston area, Dunkin’ know how to make an ad like a Dunkin’ ad. However, with people slightly put off by Jeremy Strong in a vat of Coffee grounds, this year’s effort didn’t quite feel as much like a Dunkin’ ad.
“I liked that they brought the DunKings thing back, but just wasn't sure who everyone other than Affleck and Belichick were.”
Taco Bell  |  For The Fans
Branded Memorability: 63 (+5 vs. 2022)
Taco Bell maintained a consistent level of positivity throughout a piece that focused on everyday fans (with a small injection of celebrity involvement). However, as the ad sped up both visually and audibly, irritation saw a slight uplift—resulting in feelings of annoyance being many people’s concluding memory. As such, general likeability toward the ad suffered.
“The background music was quite annoying towards the end.”
DoorDash  |  DashPass Math
Branded Memorability: 56 (-21 vs. 2024)
While last year’s DoorDash spot rocketed to the top end of the Super Bowl rankings, this year’s creative idea left some people scratching their heads. The theme and visuals of extravagant spending seemed confusingly juxtaposed against the intended message of avoiding excessive delivery fees, impacting people’s recognition of the brand behind the membership offer (and the benefits it offers). As is often the case, a lack of clarity risks detracting from people’s overall enjoyment of an ad.
“I just didn't like the concept of a billionaire dashing food feeling he is saving money. I just didn't relate.”

Super Bowl learnings from the archives